Research Critique Infection Prevention Behaviours

Question: Discuss about theResearch Critique for Infection Prevention Behaviours. Answer: Research Critique: Research critique is the critique who is getting involved to find out weakness of the research article. All the time a research article contributes an endeavour to find out a solution through the research activity. The solution may not be get reached all the time but the effort need to be authentic a research critique took and endeavour to jugged the authenticity of the research enterprise and offer suggestion to the future enterprises in that same direction by finding out the lacunas or the shortcoming of the previous research (Glanz,. and Bishop, 2010). A critical appreciation of the article Infection prevention as a show: A qualitative study of nurses infection prevention behaviours contributed by Carole Jackson ,Karen Lowton, Peter Griffiths will help to develop a proper understanding to reader as well as the future researcher regarding the effectiveness of the article and its exact contribution to the selected field. At first it is important to adopt a perspective to judge the article from the perspective of the hypothesis of the research. The key issue of this research is to find out the exact nature of non compliance and inappropriate behaviour. The hypothesis of this research is non compliance and inappropriate behaviour is one of the major cause of the dispersion of infection( Glass,. and McAtee, 2006) The research took an attempt to articulate the exact nature of non compliance and inappropriate behaviour. According to this context it can be said that the researchers remain focus to the stated hypothesis all throughout the research process. The research findings are consistent with the research direction given by the hypothesis. Aim of the research to is to find out the root causes of the dispersion of infection through the human behaviour. In this research the researchers selected a particular community for their research. The nurses are the health care professional with required qualification and professional training it also the truth that they are the people with interact with infectious person consciously. From that context one assumption can be made on the basis of vigilance this community soups to retain some professional code. The focus community of the researchers doesnt represent the mainstream population of the society. In research hypothesis there is a indication towar ds the generic behavioural practice of the common people but the health care professionals do not belong to that category(Whitley, Kite, and Adams, 2012). From this observation it can be said that the research findings may not represent the exact scenario of the behavioural practice of the common masses. The finding and the discussion section of this research article made an elaborate discussion regarding the practice of health care professional and also incorporated some subjective statements belong to them but didnt made a single indication towards the Psychological theory of Cognitive dissonance and the concept of defence mechanism. The appropriation of behaviour is largely depend up on human psychology rather than social process of reinforcement. The researcher adopted an exclusive angle towards a certain trained and qualified community and eluded the social reality. The infection may get dispersed through the inappropriate behaviour may belong to the any corner of the human com munity not from the health care professional only (Parens, Chapman,. and Press, 2006). The introduction of the article echoed the utterance made in the hypothesis and attempted to justify the stand point adopted by the researchers. The major contradiction of the whole depiction is the hypothesis described the result of certain behavioural trait in an uncontrolled atmosphere. Uncontrolled atmosphere always governs by norm that regulate society but the health care setting is a controlled atmosphere that is regulated by the code of standardization and subjected to audit on the demand of the situation. The possibility and practice of reinforcement is plausible here. Introduction attempted to justify a rational stance for an irrational choice. In research finding the issue of rationalising the irrational, got reflected the research made an in-depth analysis of the behavioural detail of the nurse community. In this course of research the researchers have taken interviews of the nurse and health professionals and collected their behavioural details for the regular practice. T he question of compliance arises in that point of time. The mechanical nature of human behaviour is lying beneath the regular movement of the individuals (Patton, 2005. ). The whole research should get governs by the psychological theories rather than sporadic information regarding the practice of health care. The major aim of any researches enterprise is to generalise the findings of research. Controlled environment is needed for certain research practice that demands environmental intervention to achieve the findings but if the controlled environment is the base of the research the findings of the research cannot work as a generalised articulation of certain common behavioural trait the whole research has been confined within certain community and representing the common trait of human behaviour The point of contr5adiction is coming out of that. The research is putting emphasise on the qualitative sampling rather than quantitative one. In order to find out the qualitative informat ion the research put more emphasis on the interview and the personal experiences of the individual.. This process will not articulate the common trend of practice. In finding the researchers indicated few points those belong to the common human nature. The issue of rationalising the irrational activity of some one or finding out irrationality in the behavioural approach of the other people rather than self are the common manifestation of the concept of cognitive dissonance. If the researcher adopt the process of Psychoanalysis rather qualitative questioner the approach of an individual will articulate the truth that can be coon and the generalization of the finding can be taken place that kindle the possibility of the farter research (Schulsinger,Mednick,. and Knop, 2012). Conclusion: In conclusion it can be said that the behavioural inconsistency not only caused the social disorder but public health disorder too that is the reason this type of research endeavour can add value to the cognitive practice of the academia. The cardinal goal of these cognitive practice should be the application of the cognitive finding for the betterment of the human life that is the reason the applied side of the research should get incorporated. Reference: Glanz, K. and Bishop, D.B., 2010. The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annual review of public health, 31, pp.399-418. Glass, T.A. and McAtee, M.J., 2006. Behavioral science at the crossroads in public health: extending horizons, envisioning the future. Social science medicine, 62(7), pp.1650-1671. Whitley, B.E., Kite, M.E. and Adams, H.L., 2012. Principles of research in behavioral science. Routledge. Parens, E., Chapman, A.R. and Press, N., 2006. Wrestling with behavioral genetics: science, ethics, and public conversation. JHU Press. Patton, M.Q., 2005. Qualitative research. John Wiley Sons, Ltd. Schulsinger, F., Mednick, S.A. and Knop, J. eds., 2012. Longitudinal research: Methods and uses in behavioral science (Vol. 1). Springer Science Business Media.